The first part of our assignment this week was to create
three photos relating to concepts of Web 2.0. Following their creation, we then
had to use Flickr and add them, along with appropriate tags. Then we were to
determine how many other photos were using those same tags and describe our
experience using the site. My breakdown for each image is below:
Web2.0 had 80,656, but many of the images I saw did not
pertain to the topic, as I would have thought. There were photos of just people’s
names, nature, baby and pet photography, and random colour swatches. Personally
I feel that this tag could have thousands – hundreds of thousands of related
photos, but it seems to be inflated.
PrinciplesofWeb2.0 only had my photo with the tag
Oreilly had 47,669 results that were tagged. Many of those
photos again were not similar to what my tag intended. There were a handful that
were relevant from conference talks, however.
My second photo also used the tag Web2.0 (80,656 tagged
photos)
Social Media had 267,424 photos with the tag, and a lot of
what I scrolled through seemed to be relevant, but again, I would say in the
manner I meant the tag to be used – the number was inflated with photos that
wouldn’t have been relevant.
Networking showed 2,550,953 photos with the tag, and had
similar results to the above.
My third photo used the tags Web2.0 (80,656 tagged photos),
Tagging, WebTagging, and WebTags.
The Tagging tag produced 10,324,992 results, WebTagging,
returned 2 results, and WebTags had 270 related photos.
Again, the tags with a high number seems to be inflated to
me. Upon further inspection, I noticed that some of the photos didn’t actually
have the words as tags. Instead, they were being returned in the search because
of the use of the tag in their description.
I created my Flickr account back in 2005 and only used it
briefly – I preferred Photobucket. It wasn’t a site I was completely unfamiliar
with, so I did not have any issues uploading to my profile and tagging the
photos. A feature they did not have previously, was the various copywrite
options, which I liked this time around.


No comments:
Post a Comment